We’re all in different spaces, and as Pascal pointed out in his marathon review, a 2:20 marathon would be a jog in the park for Geb. That keeps things in perspective.
When you get to be my age, it can be depressing to be beaten by youngsters running what would have been an easy run pace back in the day. But for Boomers such as myself, they’ve come up with a handy tool to if not stop the clock at least slow it down: Age Grading!
Lots of people, particularly those still in the Open category, view this as being yet another sign of the end of civilization as we know it. But I think it affords everyone a frame of reference to use in assessing one’s performance across race distances. Most races now include age-graded figures, although you can readily get them from the Web.
I considered the first part of 2008 a success largely because I was consistent in my age-graded numbers and got them higher than they had ever been. There are qualifying times for which we can strive, the two major ones for the marathon being the Olympic Trials and Boston qualifiers. The NYC Marathon has qualifying times, including from half-marathons. They are arbitrary. Some will never get a BQ, as I’ll never get an OT qualifier.
Another fun thing to do with these calculators if you’ve been running for a while is to compare times to an Open runner to see the extent to which you’ve improved or digressed. I find my times are pretty close to what they were when I was a youngster. It’s all a feedback loop, helping to push to be the best runner we can be.
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 12, 2009 at 1:41 pm
NYWolve
Age Grading is a funny thing. I have learned that the longer the distance, the less advantage (thus lower) AG time one gets. Someone told me that is because the Age Grade time is based on world record holders at any given age. Longer distances have much older record holders, and shorter distances have younger record holders. Haile Gebrselassie just set a marathon world record last year at age 34; Usain Bolt was 22 when he set records in 100m and 200m.
Thus my best AG time is in the Fifth Avenue Mile, even though I would rather have it in a great half or 10K.
February 12, 2009 at 10:14 pm
joegarland
I don’t think one should put too much into the ultimate accuracy of Age-Grading; it’s an inexact science and given the limited universe. Some of this is suggested in an article today from the Science of Sport, on exercise and aging (part of a series). But it is a useful device for comparing performances across distances and over time.
August 20, 2009 at 9:44 am
Here for the Duration; Not Passing Through « RunWestchester
[…] or 5Ks or 400s, because we’re runners, and we’re not passing through. Sure, age-grading helps us to feel competitive again as does the reality of NYRR club races in which the age-group […]