This morning saw me driving into Manhattan and going into Central Park as I’ve often done on Saturdays this past month-and-a-half. But in this case it was not to run but to take the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam, a requirement for admission to the Connecticut Bar, at 94th Street. The test tests one’s knowledge of the rules of professional responsibility, things like how one handles client money and client confidences (very carefully in both cases), what a judge can and cannot do off the bench, how to address client conflicts and a witness who is likely to be testifying falsely, and such. They actually set out realistic situations in which a lawyer might find herself. Sixty multiple-choice questions.
We’ll see how I did. I had thought of going for a run in the Park afterward, but my left IT Band has been acting up over the last several days, so that wasn’t going to happen. It was no problem on Thursday’s run but hurt yesterday — no run — and less so today. Because this happened to me recently, I think I have a handle on how to deal with it, and confess to have gotten lazy about the preventative exercises. So it’s a minor set-back, not of great concern.
While I was walking back to my car and in the Park, the temperature had reached the shorts range and the smell of Spring was in the air. Solo runners and small groups were passing on the Park Drive, and I regretted being unable to join them. Soon I hope, and I’m very pleased about discovering how easy it is for me to get into the City for the Club Saturday morning run.
Tomorrow is the year’s first Club race, the Coogan’s 5K in Fort Washington. A straight up-and-back run with a steep downhill right before the turn-around — and an up immediately on the way back. I’ve done it once. But I did not enter this year.
I am further down the depth chart on the Club’s roster, although when Jim S. turns 50 in a few months WSSAC will have a competitive 50+ team, and then I can’t duck any of these races.
Each week I receive an email from Paul Thompson. Paul, to whom I’ve referred many times before, was named the other day as the runner-of-the-year by NYRR in his age group. He is now the men’s co-captain. (Our women’s captain, Jean Chodnicki-Stemm, was a co-winner in the 50-54.) Paul’s email includes workouts for the week. It also includes as a weekly “reminder” the list of the year’s Club races, which, after tomorrow, consists of:

. . . to join a club
His wife’s a saint.
This comes to mind in the context of the special characteristics of clubs. All happy clubs, as it were, are happy in their own way. But at its core, each has several runners who are beyond passionate, who make dedicated folks like me feel like laggards but who cause us to be a bit less laggardy, and who pull us along, to run a wee bit harder, a wee bit faster, a wee bit longer, a wee bit better.
If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a thousand times. Runners should join clubs.
NYC Marathon Update. Speaking of which, I see that the deadline for registering for NY is the Ides of March. That gives me nine days to decide whether to do it. Tick-Tock, Tick-Tock.
Olympic Trials; Houston? We have a problem. Also, I was off LetsRun for a few days (amazing how little I missed) and when I came back I saw that the men’s and women’s OT will be held in Houston in January 2012. I had thought NY would get the women’s race — hoping to meet at least one person likely to qualify — but I was misinformed. USATF awarded the races to Houston unanimously. They’ll start the day before the Houston Marathon, using separate starts, as New York and Boston now do. But I don’t know how big the gap will be.
Viscerally it seems a step backwards. Perhaps I exaggerate the significance of New York, but sending it to Houston seems like relegation. From the racers’ perspective, though, it makes sense (albeit screwing up Spring 2012 race schedules). Gives plenty of time for recovery, more than the gap between Boston and London and the Olympics. I had fun in 2007 for the men’s race. I would have enjoyed 2012′s women’s.

13 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 6, 2010 at 6:20 pm
nyflygirl
agreed re: the Trials…handing out water at one of the water tables during the 2007 men’s trials was probably the best volunteer experience I’ve ever had. Yeah, there are other races w/ elites, but there was something really special about that race, that day.
March 6, 2010 at 10:30 pm
Flo
Good luck with the Exam, bet you’ll have no problem, smart man. Between your recommendation and Ewen’s Speedy Geese, the club scenario does seem really fun. Hope the IT band goes back to normal asap, can’t miss this week of beautiful shorts weather coming up!
March 6, 2010 at 11:13 pm
Robert James Reese
There are a lot of good things about being in a club, I’m sure, but I still just don’t like the idea of wearing a singlet that represents something other than me. One of the things that I love about running is how, if I’m having a crappy performance, the only affected is me. I never have to worry about letting down the team.
March 7, 2010 at 12:58 am
cg9m
rjr-
don’t know ya, and don’t often post to these things- joe was a former coach, and a good one. but i agree from the standpoint of participating especially in multisport relays. i so wish i could take back that day. rain, floods, poor shoe choice, etc. if i hadn’t had ‘the burden’ of the team (in this case), i’d never have done the race (nor gotten injured). funny- not haha-as our (experienced) swimmer said she thought the conditions were downright dangerous (big waves and strong currents for the sound). she was hypothermic upon exiting the water. maybe i’m being existentialist, but when do these events become ‘silly’? at least we didn’t have jellyfish.
-c
March 8, 2010 at 8:33 pm
joegarland
C is talking about the Westchester Tri, in which she did the run leg.
March 7, 2010 at 8:27 am
threlkeld
I have mixed feelings about Houston for the Trials. On the one hand, there was a sense of excitement about them in NY and Boston, given the presumed higher density of runners to non-runners, that I don’t know will be equaled there. On the other hand, the Trials should be chosen to allow runners to run at their best in conditions that resemble what they’ll face in the Olympics, shouldn’t they? In the case of Houston, it’s flat and relatively cool and dry, as London will likely be.
But I do know at least one likely A Standard qualifier (and definite shoo-in for B Standard) who’s not happy with the prospect of racing in Houston. She doesn’t expect to make the team. But she wants a good Trials experience and feels let down that it’s not in NY (her first choice) or Boston (close second).
As for club running, I have to agree with Robert. One reason I haven’t joined one has been that I’ve been focused on the marathon, so racing shorter races hasn’t been my strength. But I also don’t like bearing the responsibility of scoring for a team. I also am a loner in general, especially when it comes to running. Maybe because I feel obligated to chat with the person or people I’m running with and, as an introvert, over a couple of hours that has a tendency to enervate rather than energize me.
March 7, 2010 at 9:37 am
Alex
Joe, Hope you sign up for New York! Would love to follow the training and race experience through your eyes. I hope to qualify for a guaranteed entry this year and run New York next year. –Alex
March 7, 2010 at 12:08 pm
joegarland
Alex, my 2006 marathon reports are here and here, with a photo-montage here.
I did a 26-year later race review of 1983, my only other marathon.
I’m still up in the air about this year, leaning against. Because of the high entry fee, I’d rather not pay it if I’m not sure.
March 7, 2010 at 2:35 pm
Alex
Thanks for pointing those to me! I enjoyed especially the look back on 1983, your first marathon. Congrats on such superior times, belatedly. –Alex
March 7, 2010 at 1:01 pm
joegarland
Robert and Julie,
You are your own best, or worst, critics, agonizing about expectations unmet. Surely you wouldn’t feel more pressure than you already place on yourselves. And after a poor performance clubmates provide the type of support that I’m sure that H and J, respectively, provide to you. Plus it’s not as though one takes a roster spot away from someone else.
Robert, putting aside the J-E-T-S I recall seeing at the Manhattan Half, you have been in the race on which the pressure really is on you, i.e., the Green Mountain Relay. Doing one of those just ratchets up the pressure because every second you lose or give away is a second the team has lost. Conversely, it’s quite a boost to realize afterwards that saved a few seconds here and grabbed a few seconds there for the team.
Of course there’s a practical reason to join a club in New York. If you’re running the Marathon and are fast enough, you get special treatment at the start.
Clubs may not be for everyone, but they’re worth a look.
March 7, 2010 at 8:35 pm
Ewen
To Robert, Julie and others, I’m on Joe’s side of the bench and say “give club running a go.” There’s a lot to be gained from it, and little to be lost. Bouncing ideas off other runners and the camaraderie are both gains. Admittedly, there’s the the thought that one should do an event “for the club”, but if one is injured, or for whatever reason, not able to run, then that’s fine — the “pressure” is mostly self-imposed, which is no different than the “pressure” one feels about doing well in an individual race. Another gain is the feeling of satisfaction one feels about one’s contribution when the club does well. Give it a go.
March 8, 2010 at 8:32 pm
joegarland
Pete Gambaccini pulled together quotes from major contenders for the US Olympic Marathon team, but they all sound like press releases from USATF.
May 7, 2010 at 9:16 pm
Clearing The Bar « RunWestchester
[...] on my bar exam post. Results came out today and I passed. I earlier got a passing score on the ethics exam. So presumably if I satisfy the appropriate Bar folks in Connecticut that my character and fitness [...]